Aight, before I begin this report, I just wanna say - I'm 50,1% sure the staff will probably find a reason to deny this report since the Owner himself is Pakistani, the majority of staff - Pakistani, and when it comes to an outsider assaulting their own kin (even if the assaulter is objectively the right one in the argument) - Pakistani people would sacrifice him & Truth, and generally speaking - do whatever it takes just to protect their own. (ESPECIALLY during religious events / holidays).
Nothing wrong with that, and I salute y'all for the tribal Unity your culture possesses (this is why nobody has managed to conquer Afghanistan yet, kek), but when it comes to internationaly-involved matters (especially on the World Wide Web) - y'all should stick ur cultural ways up your buttholes w/ some local stimulating herbs rubbed onto it (& enjoy the pleasure while it still lasts, before reaching prostate-induced climax).
With all of the above said - this is just my (probably skewed) "IMO" and I hope y'all prove that my way of thinking is wrong ;)
(via actions, not words/promises)
Rule breaker's nick: 7786
Reason of reporting: Impersonating [RT]7789 (the original dawg - being from China)
Date: Today (April 1st)
Evidence:
(https://i.postimg.cc/XYVSkPk1/gta-vc-2025-04-01-17-51-58-27.png)
(https://i.postimg.cc/02G1mvDJ/gta-vc-2025-04-01-17-52-03-48.png)
Extra: Would highly appretiate if the one staff member that deals with the report - posts evidence (here in this topic) on the action he'd taken (if an action gets decided to be taken at all), before locking the topic.
(but the above "Extra" request is just for the "extra" bonus-points. Y'all ain't obliged to shit, ofc - especially from demanding regular plebs like me)
o/
It's clear that there is no impersonation happening here. The numbers 7768 and 7789 are different, and there's a big gap between them. If someone else happens to join with similar numbers in the future, it doesn't mean they are impersonating anyone. From the staff's perspective, this isn't impersonation, just a coincidence. We cannot treat every case like this as impersonation without clear intent to deceive.