Report

[Claude Speed]

Rule breaker's nick : cyatomorrow

Reason of reporting : reporting behalf of someone, impersonating

Date : yesterday

Evidence : https://ibb.co/37T7b0T

Extra : Yesterday, during a friendly duel against jah, I did /q once which I admit is a rulebreak and I got banned for it because "Jah" on forum account reported me. This report proves that jah himself (affected player) did not report me and the guy "cyatomorrow" reported me because:

A) He was the only one in server after me and jah. no one else.

B) He would not get consent of jah because jah knows it was all in good fun and nothing serious.

so the guy created a fake forum account named "Jah" and ironically some admin approved his account without any background check which is quite suspicious. I have attached the evidence above where jah testifies against that guy.

With this report, I demand:

1) Admins follow the report rule (Rule #25) and since Jah (affected player) has not reported me. I should be unbanned immediately because his consent was not taken.

2) The guy "cyatomorrow" should be banned for at least 5 days for falsely accusing me of messaging him and bribing him to not report me (high offense), creating fake account of Jah to get me banned.

3) Investigate which admin approved his account without any background check to confirm whether it was real jah and appropriate action should be taken.

4) the guy should be banned for at least 5-7 days because he broke 3 rules:
(A) => tampering with evidence.

(B) => bribing by making false claims against me.

(C) => impersonating Jah.

[cyatomorrow]

idk what this guy is saying, not reading all of that of course. and i explained myself on discord.



could have made a better investigation before directly deciding to report someone.

[Claude Speed]

thanks for providing that screenshot, this was before i do the 2nd evade which you recorded it, then i came again, checked something in my game then i left again

[Broly]

I couldn't find any IP match with Cyatommorow, so it's likely that he's innocent, or at least we don't have sufficient evidence against him. Therefore, no action will be taken.

Based on the current evidence, it appears that it wasn't Jah, and he hasn't openly confirmed whether he reported the user or gave consent to report them. Given this uncertainty, I will revoke Claude's ban for now and ban the Jah account instead.

Since the IP also doesn't match Jah's, I will keep Claude's ban revoked unless Jah confirms his involvement.